|
Padelford, Fay & Co. vs. The
Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Savannah. 14 Georgia 438, 520 which
states
" But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in
court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution, the Constitution, it
is true, is a compact but he is not a party to it."
|
"Ideas of reference are where it's at." -
Arthur Kleps
THE AMERICAN HALLUCINATION
AN
INDICTMENT OF THE AMERICAN MIND
a
collection of essays by Stephen Ames
Subject: THE AMERICAN
HALLUCINATION
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 14:06:18 -0400
From:
Here are some very shocking Essays that were written by Stephen Ames. I
stumbled across them a while back. These Essays made me quite upset after
reading them.
The most shocking subjects in these essays has to be that Social Security
numbers are issued by the UN through the IMF and what Stephen deduced from
the bombing of the Murrah Building. He saw something in the bombing that I
have never read or heard anyone talk about. When you read these Essays you
will come to a complete understanding of how controlled we all are.
Nicole Terry
The Ultimate Delusion.
By: Stephen Ames
Queen Elizabeth
controls and has amended U.S. Social Security, as follows: S.I. 1997
NO.1778 The Social Security (United States of America) Order 1997 Made 22nd
of July 1997 coming into force 1st September 1997.
At the Court at Buckingham Palace the 22nd day of July
1997. Now, therefore Her Majesty an pursuance of section 179 (1) (a) and
(2) of the Social Security Administration Act of 1992 and all other powers
enabling Her in that behalf, is please, by and with advise of Her privy
Council, to order, and it is hereby ordered as follows:
"This Order may be cited as the Social Security (United States of America)
Order 1997 and shall come into force on 1st September 1997."
Does this give a new meaning to Federal Judge William Wayne Justice
stating in court that he takes his orders from England?
This order goes on to redefine words in the Social Security
Act and makes some changes in United States Law.
Remember, King George was the "Arch-Treasurer and Prince Elector of the
Holy Roman Empire and c, and of the United States of America." See: Treaty
of Peace (1783) 8 U.S. Statutes at Large 80.. Great Britain which is the
agent for the Pope, is in charge of the USA ..'
What people do not know is that the so called Founding Fathers and King
George were working hand-in-hand to bring the people of America to their
knees, to install a Central Government over them and to bind them to a
debt that could not be paid. First off you have to understand that the
UNITED STATES is a corporation and that it existed before the
Revolutionary war. See Respublica v. Sweers 1 Dallas 43. and 28 U.S.C.
3002 (15)
The United States is not a land mass, it is a corporation.
Now, you also have to realize that King George was not just the King of
England, he was also the King of France. Treaty of Peace * U.S. 8 Statutes
at Large 80. On January 22, 1783 Congress ratified a contract for the
repayment of 21 loans that the UNITED STATES had already received dating
from February 28, 1778 to July 5, 1782. Now the UNITED STATES Inc. owes
the King money which is due January 1, 1788 from King George via France.
King George funded both sides of the Revolutionary War.
Now the Articles of Confederation which were declared in force March 1,
1781 States in Article 12:
"All bills of credit emitted, monies borrowed, and debts contracted by, or
under the authority of Congress, before the assembling of the United
States, in
pursuance of the present confederation, shall be deemed and considered a
charge against the United States, for payment and satisfaction whereof the
said United States, and the public faith are hereby solemnly pledged."
The Articles of Confederation acknowledge the debt owed to King George.
Now after losing the Revolutionary War, even though the War was nothing
more than a move to turn the people into debtors for the King, the
conquest was not yet complete.
Now the loans were coming due and so a meeting was convened in Annapolis,
Maryland, to discuss the economic instability of the country under the
Articles of Confederation. Only five States come to the meeting, but there
is a call for another meeting to take place in Philadelphia the following
year with the express purpose of revising the Articles of Confederation
On February 21, 1787 Congress gave approval of the meeting to take place
in Philadelphia on May 14, 1787, to revise the Articles of Confederation.
Something had to be done about the mounting debt. Little did the people
know that the so called founding fathers were going to reorganize the
United States because it was Bankrupt.
On September 17, 1787 twelve State delegates approve the Constitution. The
States have now become Constitutors.
Constitutor: In the civil law, one who, by simple agreement, becomes
responsible for the payment of another's debt. Blacks Law Dictionary 6th
Ed.
The States were now liable for the debt owed to the King, but the people
of
America were not because they were not a party to the Constitution because
it was never put to them for a vote [[See APFN web page
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/money.htm ]]
On August 4th, 1790 an Act was passed which was Titled.-An Act making
provision for the payment of the Debt of the United States. This can be
found at 1 U.S. Statutes at Large pages 138-178. This Act for all intents
and purposes abolished the States and Created the Districts. If you don't
believe it look it up. The Act set up Federal Districts, here in
Pennsylvania we got two. In this Act each District was assigned a portion
of the debt. The next step was for the states to reorganize their
governments which most did in 1790. This had to be done because the States
needed to legally bind the people to the debt. The original State
Constitutions were never submitted to the people for a vote. So the
governments wrote new constitutions and submitted them to people for a
vote thereby binding the people to the debts owed to Great Britain. The
people became citizens of the State where they resided and ipso facto a
citizen of the United States. A citizen is a member of a fictional entity
and it is synonymous with subject.
What you think is a state is in reality a corporation, in other words, a
Person.
"Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is Person." 9 F. Supp 272 "Word "person"
does not include state. 12 Op Atty Gen 176.
There are no states, just corporations. Every body politic on this planet
is a corporation. A corporation is an artificial entity, a fiction at law.
They only exist in your mind. They are images in your mind, that speak to
you. We labor, pledge our property and give our children to a fiction.
For an indepth look into the nature of these corporations and to see how
you also have been declared a fictional entity. See: AMERICAN LAW AND
PROCEDURE. JURISPRUDENCE AND LEGAL INSTITUTIONS. VOL.XIII By James De Witt
Andrews LL.B. (Albany Law School), LL.D. (Ruskin University) from La Salle
University. This book explains in detail the nature and purpose of these
corporations, you will be stunned at what you read.
Now before we go any further let us examine a few things in the
Constitution.
Article six section one keeps the loans from the King valid it states;
"All
Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this
Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this
Constitution, as under the Confederation."
Another interesting tidbit can be found at Article One Section Eight
clause Two which states that Congress has the power to borrow money on the
credit of the United States. This was needed so the United States (Which
went into Bankruptcy on January 1, 1788) could borrow money and then
because the States were a party to the Constitution they would also be
liable for it.
The next underhanded move was the creation of The United States Bank in
1791. This was a private Bank of which there were 25,000 shares issued of
which 18,000 were held by those in England. The Bank loaned the United
States money in exchange for Securities of the United States
Now the creditors of the United States which included the King wanted paid
the Interest on the loans that were given to the United States. So
Alexander Hamilton came up with the great idea of taxing alcohol. The
people resisted so George Washington sent out the militia to collect the
tax which they did. This has become known as the Whiskey rebellion. It is
the Militia's duty to collect taxes. How did the United States collect
taxes off of the people if the people are not a party to the Constitution?
I'll tell you how. The people are slaves! The United States belongs to the
founding fathers, their posterity and Great Britain. America is nothing
more than a Plantation. It always has been. How many times have you seen
someone in court attempt to use the Constitution and then the Judge tells
him he can't. It is because you are not a party to it. We are
SLAVES!!!!!!! If you don't believe read Padelford, Fay & Co. vs. The Mayor
and Aldermen of the City of Savannah. 14 Georgia 438, 520 which states
" But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in
court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution, the Constitution, it
is true, is a compact but he is not a party to it."
Now back to the Militia. Just read Article One Section Eight clause (15)
which states that it is the militia's job to execute the laws of the
Union. Now read Clause (16) Which states that Congress has the power to
provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the Militia, and for
governing such part of them as may be employed in the service of the
United States.... the Militia is not there to protect you and me, it is
their duty to collect our substance.
As you can plainly see all the Constitution did is set up a
Military Government to guard the King's commerce and make us slaves.
If one goes to 8 U.S. statutes at large 116-132 you will find "The Treaty
of
Amity, Commerce and Navigation". This Treaty was signed on November 19th,
1794 which was twelve years after the War. Article 2 of the Treaty states
that the King's Troops were still occupying the United States. Being the
nice King that he was, he decided that the troops would return to England
by June 1st, 1796. The troops were still on American soil because, quite
frankly the King wanted them here.
Many people tend to blame the Jews for our problems, but they too are for
the most part also slaves. Jewish Law does however govern the entire
world, as found in Jewish Law by MENACHEM ELON, DEPUTY PRESIDENT SUPREME
COURT OF ISRAEL, to wit:
"Everything in the Babylonian Talmud is binding on all Israel. Every town
and country must follow all customs, give effect to the decrees, and carry
out the enactment's of the Talmudic sages, because the entire Jewish
people accepted everything contained in Talmud. The sages who adopted the
enactment's and decrees, instituted the practices, rendered the decisions,
and derived the laws, constituted all or most of the Sages of Israel. It
is they who received the tradition of the fundamentals of the entire Torah
in unbroken succession going back to Moses, our teacher."
We are living under what the Bible calls Mammon. As written in the subject
Index, Mammon is defined as ("Civil law and procedure").
Now turn to the "The Shetars Effect on English Law" -- A Law of the Jews
Becomes the Law of the Land, found in "The George Town Law Journal, Vol
71: pages 1179-1200." It is clearly stated in the Law Review that the Jews
are the property of the Norman and Anglo-Saxon Kings. It also explains
that the Talmud is the law of the land. It explains how the Babylonian
Talmud became the law of the land, which is now known as the Uniform
Commercial Code which is private international law. The written credit
agreement -- the Jewish shetar is a lien on all of the property in the
world. The treatise also explains that the Jews are owned by Great Britain
and that the Jews are in charge of the Baking system.
We are living under the Babylonian Talmud. It was brought into England in
1066 and has been enforced by the Pope, Kings and the various religions
ever since. It is total and relentless mind control, people are taught to
believe in things that do not exist. Private International Law, which is
commercial law, only deals with fictions, known as persons. A person is a
fictional entity at law, not a living being. See UCC 1-201.
Now before you scream that the UCC is unconstitutional I'm sorry people,
you are not a party to any constitution. Read the case cite below.
"But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court,
on the ground of a breach of the Constitution. The Constitution it is
true, is a compact, but he is not a party to it." Padelford, Fay & Co.,
vs. Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Savannah 14 Ga. 438, 520
You have to understand that Great Britain,(Article six Section one) the
United States and the States are the parties to the Constitution not you.
Let me try to explain. If I buy an automobile from a man and that
automobile has a warranty and the engine blows up the first day I have it.
Then I tell the man just forget about it. Then you come along and tell the
man to pay me and he says no. So you take him to court for not holding up
the contract. The court then says case dismissed. Why? Because you are not
a party to the contract. You cannot sue a government official for not
adhering to a contract (Constitution) that you are not a party too. You
better accept the fact that you are a Slave. When you try to use the
Constitution you are committing a CRIME known as CRIMINAL TRESPASS. Why?
Because you are attempting to infringe on a private contract that you are
not a party to. Then to make matters worse you are a debt slave who owns
no property or has any rights. You are a mere user of your Masters
property! Here are just a couple of examples:
"The primary control and custody of infants is with the government"
Tillman V. Roberts. 108 So. 62
"Marriage is a civil contract to which there are three parties-the
husband, the wife and the state." Van Koten v. Van Koten. 154 N.E. 146.
"The ultimate ownership of all property is in the State: individual
so-called 'ownership" is only by virtue of Government, i.e. law amounting
to mere user; and use must be in accordance with law and subordinate to
the necessities of the State. Senate Document No. 43 73rd Congress 1st
Session. (Brown v. Welch supra) You own no Property because you are a
slave. Really you are worse off than a slave because you are also a
debtor.
"The right of traffic or the transmission of property, as an absolute
inalienable right, is one which has never existed since governments were
instituted, and never can exist under government." Wynehamer v. The
People. 13 N.Y. Rep.378, 481
Great Britain to this day collects taxes from the American people. The IRS
is not an Agency of the United States Government.
[[ See APFN web
page
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/irstax.htm
]]
All taxpayers have an Individual Master File which is in code. By using
IRS Publication 6209, which is over 400 pages, there is a blocking series
which shows the taxpayer the type of tax that is being paid. Most
taxpayers fall under a 300-399 blocking series, which 6209 states is
reserved, but by going to BMF 300-399 which is the Business Master File in
6209 prior to 1991, this was U.S.-U.K. Tax Claims, meaning taxpayers are
considered a business and involved in commerce and are held liable for
taxes via a treaty between the U.S. and the U.K., payable to the U.K. The
form that is supposed to be used for this is form 8288, FIRPTA-Foreign
Investment Real Property Tax Account. The 8288 form is in the Law
Enforcement Manual of the IRS, chapter 3. The OMB's-paper-Office of
Management and Budget, in the Department of Treasury, List of Active
Information
collections, Approved Under Paperwork Reduction Act is where form 8288 is
found under OMB number 1545-0902, which says U.S. with holding tax return
for dispositions by foreign persons, of U.S. Form #8288, #8288a.
These codes have since been changed to read as follows: IMF 300-309,
Barred Assessment, CP 55 generated valid for MFT-30, which is the code for
the 1040 form. IMF 310-399 reads the same as IMF 300-309, BMF 390-399
reads U.S.-U.K. Tax Treaty Claims. Isn't it INCREDIBLE that a 1040 form is
a payment of a tax to the U.K.? Everybody is always looking to 26 U.S.C.
for the law that makes one liable for the so called Income Tax but, it is
not in there because it is not a Tax, it is debt collection through a
private contract called the Constitution of the United States Article Six,
Section One and various agreements. Is a cow paying an income tax when the
machine gets connected to it's udders ? The answer is no. I have never
known a cow that owns property or has been compensated for its labor. You
own nothing that your labor has ever produced. You don't even own your
labor or yourself. Your labor is measured in current credit money, which
is debt. You are allowed to retain a small portion of your labor so that
you can have food, clothing shelter and most of all breed more slaves.
You see, we are cows, the IRS is company who milks the cows and the United
States Inc. is the veterinarian who takes care of the herd and Great
Britain is the Owner of the farm in fee simple. The farm is held in
allodium by the Pope.
Now the picture will become much clearer after reading the next few
paragraphs. We will now show the Popes involvement in the scheme of
things.
"Convinced that the principles of religion contribute most powerfully to
keep nations in the state of passive obedience which they owe to their
princes, the high contracting parties declare it to be their intention to
sustain in their respective states, those measures which the clergy may
adopt with the aim of ameliorating their interests, so intimately
connected with the preservation of the authority of the princes; and the
contracting powers join in offering their thanks to the Pope for what he
has already done for them, and solicit his constant cooperation in their
views of submitting the nations." Article (3) Treaty of Varona (1822)
If the Sovereign Pontiff should nevertheless, insist on his law being
observed he must be obeyed. Bened. XIV., De Syn. Dioec, lib, ix., c. vii.,
n. 4. Prati, 1844. Pontifical laws moreover become obligatory without
being accepted or confirmed by secular rulers. Syllabus, prop. 28, 29, 44.
Hence the jus nationale,(Federal Law) or the exceptional ecclesiastical
laws prevalent in the United States, may be abolished at any time by the
Sovereign Pontiff. Elements of Ecclesiastical Law. Vol. I 53-54.
So could this be shown that the Pope rules the world?
The Pope (Vicar of Christ) claims to be the ultimate owner of everything
in the World. See Treaty of 1213, Papal Bulls of 1455 and 1492.
Don't let this information alarm you because without it you cannot be
free, You have to understand that all slavery and freedom originates in
the mind. When your mind allows you to accept and understand that the
United States, Great Britain and the Vatican are corporations which are
nothing but fictional entities which have been placed into your mind, you
will understand that our slavery is because we believe in fictions.
THE END
AN INDICTMENT OF THE
AMERICAN MIND
BY: Stephen Ames
So how do most American's resolve conflicts they face when authority
figures command them to negate human life or human dignity?
The most important and best known study on obedience to authority was
carried out by Stanely Milgram at Yale University in the early 1960's. His
work can be found in the Journal of Abnormal and Social psychology, 67,
371-378 (1963) and in a book authored by him "Obedience to Authority"
published by Harper and Row (1974).
The most fascinating aspect of Milgram's work was that the results he came
up with surprised both himself and his colleagues. In fact his work almost
entirely escaped one of the most common complaints leveled at
psychological research, namely that the experimental findings merely
confirm common sense. There was a wide variety of people of different ages
and occupations involved in the experiment.
This is how the experiment worked. You are taken into a room and met by a
31 year old biology teacher, the experimenter. The other person in the
room is a 47 year old accountant who is mild mannered and likable.
The experimenter tells you that he is interested in learning about the
effects of punishment on learning. It is decided by drawing lots that the
accountant will be the learner and you will be the teacher. You go into a
room where the learner is strapped into an "electric chair" and an
electrode is strapped to his wrist. Electrode paste is applied to his
wrist to avoid burns and blisters. You are told that the electrode is
connected to a nearby shock generator.
You go into another room, which has the shock generator unit in it. It has
30 lever switches, each labeled with a voltage between 15 and 450 volts.
Groups of four switches of increasing voltage are labeled Slight Shock,
moderate Shock, Strong Shock, very Strong Shock, Intense Shock, extreme
Intensity Shock, and DANGER: Severe Shock. The final two levers are simply
marked XXX.
You are told to administer a shock to the learner each time he answers
wrong and to move one level higher each time.
As the learning tasks proceeds, the learner would make a number of
mistakes and receive more intense shocks. After receiving shocks of 75, 90
and 105 volts, he would merely grunt. At 120 volts he would yell to the
experimenter that the shocks were becoming painful. At 150 volts he would
yell 'Get me out of here ! I won't be in this experiment anymore! I refuse
to go on!" At 180 volts he yells "I can't stand the pain", and at 270
volts his response becomes a scream. Thereafter, there are screams of
agony, and a vehement refusal to go on with the experiment or provide
answers to questions. When the 300 volt shock is reached, he pounds on the
wall. If you , the "teacher", say at any point that you don't want to
continue the experiment, the experimenter calmly informs you that you
must.
What would you do in that situation? What do you think other people would
do? Stanely Milgram put these two questions to psychiatrists, students and
middle class adults. When predicting their own behavior, absolutely
everyone predicted that they would defy the experimenter and refuse to
continue with the experiment. People tend to have a high opinion of
themselves. For example, psychiatrists at a leading medical school
predicted that only 3.73 percent of subjects would obey the experimenter
at 300 volts and that only 1 in a 1000 would go to the 450 volt stage.
Most people unfamiliar with the actual results would predict that only a
psychopath or a sadist would be likely to keep on administering intense
electric shocks to an obviously distraught, tortured and unwilling
subject. But, in fact, Milgram found that 62 percent of the people exposed
to the conditions just described continued to obey the experimenter to the
lethal 450 volt level! In fact 500 times as many individuals prepared to
administer the maximum shock as predicted by a group of psychiatrists!
The learner was in collusion with the experimenter and did not actually
receive any electric shocks at all. The study was rigged so that the mild
mannered accountant was always the learner and the subject would always be
the teacher.
Milgram also argued that what critics of his work really objected to was
the terrible picture it drew of human nature rather than the deception or
methodology involved. Would the Milgram study have been the subject of
public outrage if all the participants had disobeyed the experimenter at
the first sign of discomfort from the learner? The evidence suggests not.
Several people were given a description of the Milgram study; some were
told that most of the participants were obedient to the experimenter, and
the rest that most of them were disobedient. They rated the experiment as
more harmful and as providing a worse experience when there was a large
measure of obedience.
In the Milgram study, the experimenter represented an authority figure.
His authority was enhanced by the special coat he wore, by his association
with Yale university, by his aura of expertise in human behavior.
On the other hand the "learner" in the Milgram study did everything he
could to persuade the subject to stop administering shocks. He screamed,
he begged the subject to stop and in some cases he even said he had a
heart condition. The participant was unable to satisfy both the
experimenter and the victim of torture. Most people chose to side with the
experimenter. The experimenter was perceived as an authority figure so
obedience, even commands to commit torture were considered the norm. After
the experiment the subjects were debriefed and it was explained to them
that the were not really electrocuting the learner.
When a human being was replaced with a puppy in a Milgram type experiment
in which actual electricity was used because you can't make a puppy yelp
and howl without pain. Only 54 per cent of male participants would
administer a genuine electric shock to the puppy. But 100 per cent of the
female participants were prepared to give the most severe shock to the
howling and yelping puppy. This I find very troubling.
A psychiatrist by the name of R.D. Laing along with numerous other
psychiatrists claim that mental illness is a myth. They argue, anyone
allegedly suffering from mental illness is simply behaving in ways which
deviate from those which are expected. I would like to point out that
anyone who would not inflict 450 volts into another human being on command
is outside of the normal in American Society Largely America (62 per cent)
is made up of sadists, psychopaths and potential murderers and considers
behavior outside of their own as abnormal. They label those who are unlike
them as mentally ill or criminals.
For example, most American's tend to become quite upset if you do not want
to pay the Internal Revenue Service. First, the Internal Revenue Service
is not a United States Government Agency, it is an Agency of the
International Monetary Fund; second, there is no law in the United States
Code requiring the vast majority of the American people to pay or file
anything with the Internal Revenue Service; third, a 1040 form is for a
payment of a debt to Great Britain; fourth, not one electron collected by
the Internal Revenue Service goes to the United States government (The
United States has not had a Treasury since 1921); fifth, the Internal
Revenue Service does not collect money, It collects electrons. It has to
collect these electrons or pretended hyperinflation would set in. The
electrons collected by the Internal Revenue Service are not placed
into an account, the electrons are simply deleted. People do not seem to
be able to grasp that a loan is nothing more than computer key strokes.
The only reason that there is interest on a pretended loan is because
people might figure out what is going on, because in their minds banks
make money by charging interest on loans. The reality of the situation is
banks do not make loans. Banks put electrons into circulation. People make
payments in electrons on what they think is the principle plus the
interest of a loan. If you want to pay the Internal revenue Service or a
Bank just send them a nine volt battery and tell them to keep the change.
Whether they collect electrons or not is debatable. It depends on whether
or not you agree with Max Planck, because waves are particles and
particles are waves. (We are told that there is not a unified theory and
that physicists are searching for it, that is not true. Your entire
existence, commerce, religion, reality and very thoughts can be summed up
in this equation.
This equation is not a theory but, a proof. The proof is:
1.602 x 10-19 C à E¥
FT = h /E¥m
h/ E¥m [coupled with] Ft = I
I à D3
D3 = R (R being "Reality")
eR = 0
Zero is the absence of quantity and a linguistic element.
To make matters even worse , when you don't pay the Internal Revenue
Service or a bank, people consider you a criminal or a dead beat. You are
then prosecuted by someone who is a subordinate (Pretended U.S. Attorney
paid by the IMF in electrons) of the Alien Property Custodian (Pretended
Attorney General of the United States, INTERPOL agent, paid in electrons
by IMF). I almost forgot: You are the Alien. Read the list below:
1. The IRS is not a U.S. Government Agency. It is an Agency of the IMF.
2. The IMF is an Agency of the UN.
3. The U.S. Has not had a Treasury since 1921.
4. The U.S. Treasury is now the IMF.
5. The Attorney General of the U.S. is not employed by the U.S. But is an
Agent of INTERPOL which is head quartered in Lyons, France.
6. The United States does not have any employees.
7. Social Security Numbers are issued by the UN through the IMF.
8. There are no Judicial courts in America and there has not been since
1789. Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators
enforce Statutes and Codes.
9. There have not been any Judges in America since 1789. There have just
been Administrators.
10. According to the GATT you must have a Social Security number.
11. You are an "Institutional Unit" in which your body and labor are
pledged to the UN through the IMF.
12. We have One World Government, One World Law and a One World Monetary
System.
13. Your Social Security number is your slave number. Just about everyone
in the World has a Social Security number from the UN through the IMF.
14. The UN is a One World Super Government.
15. No one on this planet has ever been free. This planet is a Slave
Colony.
There has always been a One World Government. It is just that now it is
much better organized and has changed its name as of 1945 to the United
Nations.
16. New York City is defined in the Federal Regulations as the United
Nations.
Rudolph Gulliani stated on C-Span that "New York City was the capital of
the World" and he was correct.
17. Social Security is not insurance or a contract, nor is there a Trust
Fund.
18. Your Social Security check comes directly from the IMF which is an
Agency of the UN.
19. You own no property, slaves can't own property. Read the Deed to the
property that you think is yours. You are listed as a Tenant.
20. The most powerful court in America is not the United States Supreme
Court but, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
GUESS WHO AND WHAT OWNS YOU AND THE UNITED NATIONS ?
As a matter of fact the imagined President, imagined Representatives,
imagined Senators, imagined Supreme Court Justices and imagined Federal
Judges are not paid by the United States Government. Actually the United
States Government does not have any employees They are paid by the
International Monetary Fund in electrons. You see there is no such thing
as the United States Government. In reality there are no governments.
There are Corporations (Fictions) such as the Federal Reserve Inc., and
the United States Inc., which in fact are private corporations. The United
States Inc., is just a slave management company. Guess what that makes
you? If you said property, you are correct! You are Human Capital. The
shares that were issued for the Federal Reserve when it was created back
in 1913 only cost $100.00. That was quite the bargain.
To verify the facts in the preceding paragraphs see (5 U.S.C. 903, 12
U.S.C. 95, 18 U.S.C.A. 914, 22 U.S.C. 263, 285, 286, 287, 288. Public Law
89-719, Public Law 94-564, Public Law 101-167, Public Law 91-151 Public
Law 103-465, House Report 103-826 T.D.O 150-10, T.D.O. 92, 41 Stat. Chap
214 pg. 654, Emergency Banking Act 48 Stat. 1, Articles of Agreement 60
Stat. 1440, 20 CFR chapter 111, subpart B 422.103 (b) (2) (2), United
Nations Secretariat Revised System of National Accounting, Diversified
Metal Products v. IRS et al. CV-93-405E-EJE U.S.D.C.D.I., Cromelin v.
United States, 177 F.2d 275, 277 Tomalewski v. United States, 493 F.Supp
673, 675 Foster v. Bork, 425 F.Supp 1318, 1319-20 FRC v. GE 281 U.S. 464,
Keller v. PE 261 U.S. 428, United States v. LePatourel, 571 F2d
405, 410, Respublica v. Sweers 1 Dallas 43, INTERPOL Constitution Art. 30,
Executive Order 10422, Papal Bulls of 1455 and 1493. 42 Pa.C.S.A. 502.
General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs.
When you see the documents for yourself, your mind will shatter into a
thousand pieces. You will have to acknowledge that your entire life has
been nothing buta hallucination. You will have to acknowledge that there
is NOT, NOR HAS THERE EVER BEEN A GOVERNMENT, COUNTRIES, MONEY, OR
CONSTITUTIONS. All GOVERNMENTS AND COUNTRIES ARE FABRICATED FICTIONS
CLEVERLY WOVEN INTO YOUR MIND. They are fictions accepted by you because
you have been lied to and poisoned your entire life.. What would you do
without an external authority commanding you what to do and what not to
do? Would you be lost? Did you ever think that maybe you would find
yourself? I am not afraid to acknowledge that I am an incomplete 'Being in
motion' searching for my reason for existing in this Petry dish commonly
called Earth. The evidence in my possession cannot be rebutted. Think
twice before labeling me.
One can quickly become diagnosed mentally ill for stating the facts listed
above. Most American's want people who research and discover things such
as those listed above to be locked away or murdered because, it holds a
mirror up to them and shows the evil that actually lurks in their hearts.
That is exactly what has happened to me. Don't you want my death? The
people here in Pennsylvania love death. They also want Mumia Jamal, Lisa
Lambert and a host of other innocent people murdered. When federal Judge
Danzell released Lisa Lambert on a Habeas Corpus the people here in
Central Pennsylvania wanted Judge Danzell impeached. They want Lisa
Lambert dead. Judge Danzell said that Lisa Lambert's case was the worst
case that he has ever seen in the English speaking world. Like Jim
Morrison said in the film "The Doors", "Hatred is a very under estimated
emotion."
I will be dead soon enough. I am living in a "madhouse" now. I have been
living here for a couple of months. I am on a steady diet of Lithium
Haldol etc., which sooner or later kills you. It's not that I really want
to live in this world but, the death caused by the mixture of Lithium and
Haldol is a terrible form of torture. I don't like it here. I don't have
anyone to talk to. I don't even have my own room. I feel so sorry for the
people that live here. In my opinion not one of them is mentally ill. They
all seem to be suffering from living through terrible childhood's and
never having anyone in their lives who cared about or loved them. I am
glad that they did allow me to bring my computer with me. So I just sit
here on the floor and type away. This essay will probably never be read by
anyone. It is more of a diary than an essay. I am writing it for myself
and my children. I write everyday and save it on disk so that when my
children grow up, they can read for themselves why their dad was locked
away in a home for the Insane. I never thought that they would go this far
and do this to me and rob my children of their father. But, I do the
unspeakable -- I commit thought crimes.
THE END
Labels for you and me.
By: Stephen Ames
The importance of labels was memorably expressed by R.D.Laing. He claimed
that if someone labeled a scientist said "All men are machines", he might
receive a Nobel prize. In contrast, if someone labeled a schizophrenic
said "I am a machine", he would promptly be locked away.
An attempt to evaluate the relative merits of these two diametrically
opposed positions, was made by David Rosenhan of Stanford University.
David Rosenhan was extremely interested in the various approaches that
have been adopted towards the treatment of psychiatric disorders. He
wondered, is it really as simple to distinguish between normality and
abnormality as is implied by the medical model?
Finally he came up with a way of trying to determine how well psychiatrist
are able to distinguish between the normal and the abnormal, or between
the sane and insane. What would happen if a number of entirely sane people
attempted to gain admission to a mental hospital by pretending to have one
of the symptoms of insanity? Would they be classified insane ? If they
were admitted, would the staff
realize that a mistake had been made?
The answers to these and other questions were obtained in a study in which
eight normal people, five men and three women, attempted to gain admission
to twelve different psychiatric hospitals. The twelve psychiatric
hospitals were located in five different states on the East and West
coasts.
Each of the eight participants phoned the hospital asking for an
appointment. Upon arrival at the admissions office, each of them
complained of hearing voices (these voices were often unclear, but
appeared to be saying 'empty', 'hollow', and 'thud'. All were judged to be
insane, and all were admitted to the hospital, on the basis of their
symptom. One was diagnosed as manic-depressive psychosis, the others as
schizophrenic. But as soon as they had been admitted the participants
stopped simulating signs of abnormality, although several had a brief
period of nervousness and anxiety because they felt they would immediately
be exposed as frauds.
While in the hospital, the participants indicated that they felt well and
were no longer troubled by 'voices'. In general, they behaved in a
friendly and cooperative way. The only strange activity they engaged in
was they spent time writing down their observations about the ward they
were in. To begin with, these notes were written in secret, but it became
clear that the staff did not notice, so the note-taking was done quite
openly. This, in my humble opinion, was accomplished because most people
who work on a psychiatric ward (This is from personal experience) are some
of the lowest functioning people in society. Their main concern is control
of your thoughts and emotions. They seem to enjoy overpowering you to the
point of the destruction of your mental faculties. What they can not
accomplish with torture and punishment, they accomplish through
pharmaceuticals. If you resist the taking of the pharmaceuticals, you will
be held down and be given them by either injection or enema.
The structure of the various hospitals was such that those of the greatest
professional status had the least to do with their patients. The average
daily contact of the participants was about 6 minutes. The actual length
of hospitalization ranged from 7 to 52 days.
The fact that all the participants were released within a few weeks would
make you think that the psychiatric staff discovered that they had been
sane all the time, but no. All of the participants were discharged with a
diagnosis of 'schizophrenia in remission.'
Quite a number of the real patients did become suspicious about the
participants. The first three participants were placed in wards with a
total of 118 patients, 35 of the patients voiced their doubts that the
participants were mentally ill. They said things like 'You're a
journalist, or a professor. You're checking up on the hospital.'
These findings suggest that the distinction between the sane and insane is
so blurred that psychiatrists constantly diagnose the sane for the insane.
It is ironic that over 30 percent of the real patients knew that the
participants were sane. As a matter of fact the participants, after
insisting that they were ill to the real bona-fide patients, the real
patients still didn't buy it and insisted that the participants were sane.
Rosenhan wondered whether he could show the opposite effect, the insane
being sane. He chose as his testing ground a research and teaching
hospital. The staff there had heard about the previous experiment and
informed Rosenhan that they would not be fooled.
The first thing Rosenhan did was inform the hospital staff at this
hospital that he was going to send in one or more pseudo-patients and have
them attempt to gain admission into the psychiatric ward during the
following three months. Each member of the staff was asked to observe all
patients who presented themselves for admission or in the ward and say
whether they thought they were his pseudo-patients or genuine patients.
Judgments were made on a total of 193 patients admitted for psychiatric
treatment. Forty-one genuine patients were judged to be his
pseudo-patients by at least one member of the staff. Nineteen patients
were suspected of being frauds by one of the psychiatrists and another
member of the staff. But the fact is, none of Rosenhan's pseudo-patients
sought admittance during this time. The people that were judged to be
impostors were in fact real patients. The staff did not know the
difference. This proves that mental hospital staff do know that they are
admitting people, diagnosing them mentally ill, prescribing them dangerous
pharmaceuticals, even forcing them to ingest the pharmaceuticals when
they know quite well that the people are sane.
Rosenhan's conclusion was: 'It's clear that we cannot distinguish the sane
from the insane in psychiatric hospitals'.
One of the other points made by Rosenhan concerned the degrading
conditions experienced by his pseudo-patients during their stays in the
Psychiatric Wards. Rosenhan himself saw a patient beaten for walking up
to one of the staff members and saying 'I like you'.
On numerous occasions, when the pseudo-patients approached staff members
with polite requests for information, the staff simply ignored the request
over 80 percent of the time and did not answer. When a question was
presented to a psychiatrist it went unanswered and ignored over 70 percent
of the time. That is how people are treated in the psychiatric wards at
the hospitals that I have been admitted to also. Then if you ask more than
once you are then threatened.
Now think about this. How many people receive chemotherapy for cancer when
the fact is they don't have cancer at all. What about heart disease ? How
many people are prescribed dangerous pharmaceuticals for heart disease
that do not have heart disease. Last year over 170,000 people's deaths
were caused by prescription drugs. Yet the American people line up for
them. About 3,500 deaths were caused by illicit drugs such as crack, meth,
heroin etc and zero deaths from marijuana. Yet you will go to prison if
you are caught possessing one of these drugs and you will go to prison for
a very long time if you are caught selling one of these drugs. The bottom
line is that the drug dealer on the corner is responsible for far less
deaths than medical doctors. The difference is that the drug dealer on the
corner does not have a license to KILL like the M.D.! These are prime
examples of the Cognitive Dissonance of the common American mind.
THE END
The Thoughtless Mind
BY: Stephen Ames
The bombing of the Murrah building in Oklahoma City is one of the most
sensational experiments ever conducted on the American people. Everyone
thinks there is a Government cover-up. The truth of the matter is there is
no Government cover-up. The Government wants you to think that there is a
cover-up. On the first day of the bombing when they kept reporting that
there were more bombs in the building when actually there weren't. They
want you to think that there were more bombs in the building. Then in a
few hours they changed their story after heavily reporting the existence
of more bombs. You see the reason they committed such a tragic event was
to keep you glued to the television. The bombing was committed to see how
malleable the minds of the American people are. They needed something
sensational to keep you tuned in. The bombing's only purpose was to see if
the people would have a complete lack of memory not just
day to day but hour to hour. The bombing was not about passing laws or
attacking the patriot or militia movement. It was about time factors and
the malleability of facts after they are presented over and over. They
actually killed more than one bird with this stone. They then proceeded to
get people to say that there was a cover-up happening. That is what they
want you to think. If they can't convince you that there is a cover-up,
then it proves beyond a shadow of a doubt just how non-thinking the
American people are. This was by far one of the most high risk maneuvers
ever by the Government. But, they needed to know. The results are
astounding, most people are convinced that Timothy McVeigh in a Ryder
truck did it. Other people think that the Government did it and that they
screwed up and are trying to cover it up. The truth is Timothy Mcveigh
didn't do
it, the Government did it and the Government is NOT trying to cover it up.
Actually everything went as planned and is still going that way. There are
numerous books and tapes about the supposed cover-up. People who are
producing these tapes and books don't know it, but they are doing the leg
work. The American people do not understand psychology and the
experimentation that is performed on their minds on a daily basis. I would
venture to say excluding lawyers and their kind, that maybe one in a
hundred thousand understand what the bombing of the Murrah Building was
for. [[See APFN web page:
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/okc_coverup.htm
]]
A great example of symbolism is their Gold Fringed Flag. Which according
to various pretend Army regulations and executive order signifies when
flown in a courtroom, that the court is a Military court. I know they
laugh when someone argues with a pretended judge that his court is a
Military court. The person does not seem to realize that he has just
acknowledged that he is insane because he just called the room in which he
is standing a courtroom. When in fact there is no such thing. [[See APFN
web page:
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/flag.htm ]]
An exceptional act that these pretended judges and lawyers are not
laughing about is a process that is known as Redemption. Does this process
work? You bet it does. The Redemption Process is entirely based on
fictions. By engaging in this Process known as Redemption life is being
breathed into the ultimate fictional code that binds their fictional
system together. This fictional law is known as the Uniform Commercial
Code. People pretend that they are a creditor instead of pretending that
they are a debtor. This allows people to do anything they want and not be
prosecuted for it and if one really understands the Uniform Commercial
Code, one can purchase anything one wants without having to labor like the
rest of the slaves. The act of acknowledging the Code brings the entire
pretended government to life. When you pretend to be a creditor instead of
a debtor the pretended judges and lawyers become your servants. You have
to know exactly what you are doing or they will warehouse you. The Uniform
Commercial Code is the rules of the Hallucination. That is why the
Redemption Process is successful.
The idea and concept that in order for me to trade goods and services with
someone on the other side of an imaginary line, I must pay a pretended tax
with pretended money (a few electrons) known as a tariff. Tariffs were
created for one reason and one reason only. That reason is so you would
think that there is a such thing as a Country. Countries are needed to
keep people divided so that wars can be manufactured. The wars also serve
the purpose of making you think that there is such a thing as a Country.
By keeping the people divided it becomes necessary in the minds of the
people to have a Government to protect them from the bad Countries. Of
course what you think is a bad Country is the good Country in the eyes of
the people who live there and your Country is the bad Country. Much of the
division is based on religion. People will readily commit acts of genocide
in the name of their religion.
Marriage is a really strange concept. You purchase a license from a
pretended government with electrons. Then you enter into a building that
has a large phallus on top of it. Then you stand in front of an agent from
the International Monetary Fund and take a vow that you will have sex with
the same person for the rest of your life which of course you know isn't
true. Not only do you enter into a contract with the other person, but the
pretended government that you purchased the License from is also a party
to it. Actually it is the controlling party. It is also an alter-ego of
the International Monetary Fund. I have this all documented. I almost
forgot: most of the buildings that people get married in, also fly the
Gold Fringed Flag.
Voting is total lunacy. You vote for pretended Senators, Representatives
and a President who are your sworn enemies. Don't believe it? In march of
1933 the "Trading with The Enemy Act" was amended declaring those who call
themselves "citizens of the United States" the enemy. That is how Frank
captured the gold, by executive order from the American people. You are
literally the enemy of the Fictional U.S. Government.
America is not in a moral crisis. America is in an Intelligence crisis.
Over 50 percent of American's have an I.Q. between 90 and 110. This allows
them to eat, sleep, labor and breed but not much more. It is an
impossibility for most American's to understand even the simplest of
abstract concepts or to follow the simplest of instructions. Logic,
analytical and quantum reasoning are completely out of the question. Most
American's are functionally illiterate. THIS IS NOT THEIR FAULT! It is
because of the food supply being deficient in nutrition. American's lack
of intelligence is also caused by vaccines, pharmaceuticals, fluorides,
detergents, industrial cleaners commonly called shampoo etc.
Americans have been poisoned.
Less than 0.5 percent of American's have an I.Q. of 140 or over. Most of
these people rule over the others. Take lawyers for example. You just
don't decide to be a lawyer. After four years of schooling you have to
take the LSAT. The LSAT is a test based mostly on analytical reasoning.
The LSAT plays a major role in what Magic Law School one may be accepted
into. Not all Magic Law School's are created equal. Yale University only
accepts 3 percent of the applicants. Now a buffoon would not even apply to
such a prestigious School so, we are talking the best of the best and out
of them only three percent are accepted. So after four years of schooling
in a pre law program you have to attend Magic Law School for three years
in order to become a lawyer. Even after all of that you still must pass
the BAR exam. To be a 'Magic Law Man' (Lawyer) it takes a lot of study,
discipline and intelligence. I don't like lawyers but, I do like watching
them
work their magic. I really enjoy reading their magic papers such as
motions and briefs. To me, watching a lawyer at work is by far the most
enjoyable activity one can engage in. Even after all of the horrible
things that lawyers have done to me, I still enjoy them. All lawyers lie.
They have to in order to keep the people hallucinating. Lawyers will never
tell the truth. No one would believe them anyway.
They want your mind. They even are confident enough to report it in the
Congressional Record. For example:
"We need a program of psychosurgery for political control of our society.
The purpose is physical control of the mind. Everyone who deviates from
the given norm can be surgically mutilated. The individual may think that
the most important reality is his own existence, but this is only his
personal point of view. This lacks historical perspective. Man does not
have the right to develop his own mind. This kind of liberal orientation
has great appeal. We must electrically control the brain. Some day armies
and generals will be controlled by electric stimulation of the brain." Dr.
Jose M.R. Delgado, Director of Neuropsychiatry, Yale University Medical
School, Congressional Record, No 26, vol. 118 February 24, 1974.
People have to come to grips with the fact that enlightenment is the
casting off the bonds of concept (ignorance) so that one may directly
perceive the inexpressible nature of undifferentiated reality. For some
reason that I do not understand, people do not look at undifferentiated
reality the same as an enlightened being. Words only represent
(re-present) something else. Words are not real things. In an illusory
reality everything is a symbol. The reality of symbols is illusory.
One must understand that governments are brought into your mind through
symbols such as flags, codes, constitutions and statutes which are the
will of your Master being imposed on you.
Undifferentiated reality can not be expressed. Symbols cannot be used to
describe it. Enlightenment is a state of being and it is not describable.
People seem to want to make the description of the state of being, the
state itself. A state of being is an experience. A description of a state
of being is a symbol. Symbols and experiences are not governed by the same
rules.
Max Born wrote: The ultimate origin of the difficulty lies in the fact (or
philosophical principle) that we are compelled to use words of common
language when we wish to describe a phenomenon, not by logical or
mathematical analysis, but by a picture appealing to the imagination.
Common language has grown by everyday experience and can never surpass
these limits.
THE END
Crime and Commerce
By Stephen Ames
Let us examine just what a crime is.
Crime. A positive or negative act in violation of penal law; an offense
against the State or United States.
Remember that the States and United States are fictions so, how can you
damage a fiction.
What about a Tort?
Tort. ( from Lat. torquere, to twist, tortus, twisted, wrestled aside). A
private or civil wrong or injury, including action for bad faith breach of
contract, for which the court will provide a remedy in the form of an
action for damages. K Mart Corp. v. Ponsock, 103 Nev. 39, 732 P2d 1364,
1368.
A legal wrong committed upon the person or property independent of
contract. It may be either (1) a direct invasion of some legal right of
the individual; (2) the infraction of some public duty by which special
damage accrues to the individual: (3) the violation of some private
obligation by which like damage accrues to the individual.
Notice that a crime is an act against the State, but a tort is against an
individual. So if you murder someone how is that a crime against the
State? Please note that when you are charged with an offense, you are
charged with violating a code or statute, not for violating the
individual. The reason this is being done is because the State claims to
own you, so if you kill someone it is the State that has been damaged.
A tort is either mala in se or a breech of contract that causes a damage.
There must be intent, but to commit a crime against the State there does
not need to be intent.
Mala prohibita. Prohibited wrongs or offenses; acts which are made
offenses by positive laws, and prohibited as such. Acts or omissions which
are made criminal by statute but which, of themselves, are not criminal.
Generally, no criminal intent or mens rea is required and the mere
accomplishment of the act or omission is sufficient for criminal
liability. Term is used in contrast to mala in se which are acts which are
wrong in themselves such as robbery.
When you don't file a 1040, that is an omission.
Statute. A formal written enactment of a legislative body, whether
federal,
state, city, or county. An act of the legislature declaring, commanding,
or
prohibiting something; a particular law enacted and established by the
will of the legislative department of government; the written will of the
legislature, solemnly expressed according to the forms necessary to
constitute it the law of the state. Such may be public or private,
declaratory, mandatory, directory, or enabling in nature.
Will. Wish; desire; pleasure; inclination; choice; the faculty of
conscious, and especially of deliberate, action. When a person expresses
his "will" that a particular disposition be made of his property, his
words are words of command, and the word "will" as so used is mandatory,
comprehensive, and dispositive in nature.
Will. An Instrument by which a person makes a disposition of his real and
personal property, to take effect after his death, and which by its own
nature is ambulatory and revocable during his lifetime. In re Brown's
Estate, Tex Civ. App., 507 S.W. 2d 801, 803.
Instrument. Anything reduced to writing, a document of a formal or solemn
character, a writing given as a means of affording evidence. A document or
writing which gives formal expression to a legal act or agreement, for the
purpose of creating, securing, modifying, or terminating a right. A
writing executed and delivered as the evidence of an act or agreement.
Moore v. Diamond Dry Goods Co., 47 Ariz 128, 54 P2d 553, 554.
Do you understand the Two different ways they use the word "will." What
they do is reduce their "will" to writing and then enforce it at the point
of a gun. This writing is also called a "Will."
Will, Statute, Instrument, and Code are synonymous.
Do you understand where this going? "Will" is the disposition of property
by someone's command. A Statute is the Written Will of a Legislature. It
used to be stated as "will and testament" Do you understand that when a
Legislature passes an act they are creating or modifying a will. You are
considered property of the State. Are you getting the picture? A code or
statute is a "Will."
The Codes and Statutes of every State are Wills.
(Note. When you are charged and warehoused in a jail it is because you
went against the "Will" of your "Master." It is not because you harmed
another Being.
--Nicole)
Does not a 1040 form have a label?
Label. Anything appended to a larger writing, as a codicil.
In English law, a copy of a writ in the Exchequer.
Exchequer. That department of the English government which has charge of
the collection of the national revenue; the treasury department.
Codicil. A supplement or addition to a will; it may explain, modify, add
to,
subtract from, qualify, alter, restrain or revoke provisions in existing
will.
Such does not purport to dispose of entire estate or to contain the entire
will of testator, nor does it ordinarily expressly or by necessary
implication revoke in toto a prior will. In re Crooke Estate, 388 Pa. 125,
130 A.2d 185, 187.
Do you understand why people are forced to file a 1040 ? Because King
George was the Prince Elector and Arch Treasurer of the Holy Roman Empire
and of the UNITED STATES of AMERICA.[[ See APFN web page:
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/bcolony.htm
]]
The Constitution is the
"Will." Why do you think in the preamble to the Constitution it says "to
ourselves and our Posterity?" Just read Article six section one. Remember
the loans, IRS Publication 6209 (1040 for UK),
the First Bank of the United States and numerous debt collection acts. Do
you understand why in 26 U.S.C. there is no law requiring you to file? It
is the Constitution that requires you to file, Article six section one! Do
the IRS agents know this? Look at all of the Acts (Supplements to the
Will) that have been passed to collect your labor, the symbols (electrons)
that represent your
labor. Now do you understand why the Constitution was never put to the
people for a vote? It is because they were the property (citizens,
persons, etc.) mentioned in the Will (Constitution). Now do you see why
the Constitution was drafted in secret? Do you understand that when you
pay with your labor you are adding electrons to the Estate and when you
get a refund (electrons) you are subtracting from the Estate? Do you
understand the importance of Codicil and Label? They don't even have to
connect the machine to our udders, we are self-milking slaves.
The words charge and discharge are used in the imaginary laws of commerce
because we are forced through our ignorance to use electrons as a medium
of exchange. Don't you ever wonder why you are asked by a cashier if you
would like to charge it? The slip that the cashier hands you is the symbol
of the electrons that have just entered the Circuit. Why do you think when
you are dragged into one of their 'courts' they tell you that you have
been 'charged'? What do you think a 'Transmitting Utility' in Article nine
of the Uniform Commercial Code is? So guess what the Transmitter is? Guess
what is being broadcast, charged and discharged? People do not see the
wave only the symbol of the wave. They do not know that the wave even
exists.
Why do you think that they pass bills? A bill is a charge for goods or
services. Then you have the 'Bill of Rights'. A 'Right' is one mans
ability with the assistance of the state to control others (Blacks Law
Dict.). That is why you must pay a filing fee when you file a suit against
someone. You are being charged to use the State to force other people to
be jurors, witnesses etc. Jurors are people who are being controlled by
the State on your behalf.
This is just a sampling of what has been done to us because of our greed,
laziness, contempt for our fellow man, having the nerve to pretend to make
laws and wanting something for nothing.
We are having Electronic Warfare perpetrated on us. Our very physical
bodies work upon electricity. Our thoughts are electricity. The thoughts
that are placed into our minds are placed there through the use of
electricity. The thoughts that you think are your own are not. You have to
become aware. Please make an attempt to analyze the program that has been
placed in you. You have to understand that the person who is in 'charge'
is the one who controls thought by way of controlling the electricity in
your brain. Think about it. If you had a plumber to your home and he
tracked mud all over your carpet you would phone the company who employed
him and ask to speak to the person in charge. The person in charge is the
one who controls the electric current in the plumbers brain. Now if the
plumber can not be controlled, he will be 'fired' or in other words
discharged.
What do people do when they are upset, they write to a legislator, one of
their Masters? Legislatures were created for one purpose, to make you the
property and to manage the electrical current in your brain. If a group of
people can command you to act or not to act and take your labor, what are
you? If they have the power to declare that an act that is not criminal,
is a criminal act, what are they? You are a slave and they are your
master. The thought that legislators, judges etc are in 'charge' has been
willfully and deliberately placed in your brain so that you will be their
slaves.
E
I x R
A bank is a capacitor in which the electrons flow to from ground. A check
or money order etc. are the symbol which represents the electrons. (See
definition of money in U.C.C.) A loan is actually the procedure that is
done to cause electrons to enter into the circuit. The check that you
receive from the bank is the symbol of the electrons that have been put
into a capacitor (account) in your name. This is accomplished by a few key
strokes on a computer key board. The charge (electrons) are transferred
from account to account (capacitor to capacitor) when a good or service is
transmitted. This is done either by wire or satellite. (See Electronic
Fund Transfer Blacks Law Dict. 6th Ed.) Remember an electron is both a
wave and a particle. The system must never be allowed to become balanced.
There has to always be a debt (something owed) in order for the electrons
to flow. If electrons were not removed from the circuit the capacitors
would all become equally charged and all commerce would cease. If the
capacitors
were all equal and the circuit was balanced how could one capacitor
discharge into another. The Internal Revenue Service withdraws electrons
from the Circuit by way of what is called an 'Income Tax'. Income is the
Electrons that have flowed into the circuit. There are other ways that
remove electrons but this is the most noticeable. There has to be a load
on the system in order for the electrons to flow. This must be done in
order to allow commerce to flow. A debt can never be paid. A debt can only
be discharged. The Circuit can be controlled by changing the Force,
Current, or Resistance. Your labor is actually dissipated. The harder the
people labor the more electrons they remove from the Circuit. There
becomes too many electrons in the Circuit for the amount of goods and
services consumed. So 'Taxes' must be raised or, in other words, the load
must be increased. When they tell you that the economy is expanding it
means
that the Circuit is getting larger. Notice that when they tell you the
economy is expanding most people are working harder and their standard of
living is dropping.
Now, what do the electrons symbolize? People exist by symbols. Everything
in this fictional world symbolizes something else.
Those who refuse to bow to the IRS are in actuality keeping those who do
alive. Those who bow to the IRS are destroying themselves. If we do not
send electrons to the Banks and the IRS, this ultimate system of control
will come crashing to the GROUND. In the present situation the peoples
standard of living can only go down. Both parents now must labor in order
to survive. Any variable in the system can modify it. One who is skilled
in the art of controlling the Circuit is called an Economist.
It is impossible for the mass of people to be paranoid. Paranoia is
defined as a heightened sense of awareness. People are not even at the
level of being aware, let alone paranoid. They (the mass of people) have
their voltage (thoughts) supplied to them. How can you be aware when in
your entire life you have never had a thought?
THE END
$
@
Talk to a friend about the GeorGiaGuidestones today!
|
